Tending My Fish: Reflections on a Republic in Decline 

As I contemplated last week’s election results, with all their dreary portents for the years ahead, I was reminded of the lament of a Roman senator—his power fading, his influence diminished, as Caesar’s star ascended:  

“I shall tend my fish, study philosophy, and comport myself for death. This republic holds no place for me any longer.”  

(Conspirata: A Novel of Ancient Rome, Robert Harris)  

And then I asked myself, “Does this country hold a place for me? 

The question is not rhetorical. At this late point in my life, I find myself at odds with the culture, principles, and trajectory of the nation I once revered. My beliefs—anchored in reason, history, and an old-fashioned sense of duty—seem increasingly alien in a land preoccupied with spectacle over substance.  

A Discontented Creed  

Consider, for example:  

Religion in Politics: As an agnostic, I believe that the pulpit should stay far away from the podium. Ministers and pastors claiming divine insights on policy strike me as charlatans with better wardrobes. Faith should inspire personal virtue, not dictate public policy.  

Loyalty to Allies: In diplomacy and in life, I value loyalty. A true ally stands by you in both triumph and trial. Yet we seem to cast off old friends—countries and principles alike—as if they were expired coupons.  

Science and Competence: I favor facts over feelings, competence over pretense. But ours is an age where bombast outweighs expertise, and the loudest voice is mistaken for the wisest.  

Reckoning with Our Past: This country’s history is a patchwork of greatness and failure. We have saved nations and crushed dreams, built monuments to liberty and ignored the cries of the oppressed. I believe in confronting our flaws honestly, not whitewashing them with comforting myths—or worse, erasing them entirely in the name of “offense.”  

Respect for Women: Here is a simple proposition: anyone who assaults, demeans, or dehumanizes women is unfit for public office. Full stop. Yet, 52% of white women voters apparently find this a negotiable standard. I am baffled—and disgusted.  

Character Matters: Good judgment, responsibility, empathy, and moral clarity—these should be the cornerstones of a person’s character. Increasingly, though, they are dismissed as relics of a bygone era, sacrificed on the altar of “winning at all costs.”  

A Nation Entertained to Death  The deepest cut of all, perhaps, is that we have traded informed citizenry for the hollow thrills of reality-show governance. Americans now crave entertainment over enlightenment. The morning chatter of Joe and Mika or the smirking commentary of Bill Maher may pass for insight, but to me, they feel like reruns of Neville Chamberlain in Munich, mistaking platitudes for policy while calamity looms.  

The Final Reckoning  

So here I am, like that Roman senator, contemplating my fish and philosophy. The republic of my youth—the one I fought to believe in—is unrecognizable.  

It is a strange thing to feel like an exile in one’s own country, but perhaps the true patriots are always exiles. We stand apart, unwilling to settle for the tawdry spectacle on offer, and dream of something better—a nation of character, competence, and courage.  

Until then, I will tend my fish.

The Death Rattle of American Democracy

Photo by AI

For decades, America’s democratic process has shown signs of decline. On November 5, 2024, that decline may have reached a fatal turning point. Donald Trump was re-elected as President, marking—some would say—the final blow to a weakened democracy, neglected by its stewards and estranged from its founding principles.

Three pillars are essential for democracy: (1) a transparent, fair election process, (2) qualified candidates, and (3) an informed electorate, capable of choosing wisely. Yet, in today’s climate, who genuinely trusts the judgment of the American voter?

Consider this: The stock market is booming, unemployment is at a historic low, and gas prices are stable. The Biden administration was handling critical issues from Middle Eastern conflicts to Russian aggression against Ukraine. But in this era, good governance and stability didn’t win the day.

Trump’s victory stunned many, especially with his support among white women—53% of whom preferred Trump over Harris, despite his controversial record. These female voters chose a candidate from a party poised to limit their rights, including access to abortion. How did we arrive here?

Leading up to election night, the media portrayed Trump’s campaign as a dwindling force, with sparse rally turnouts and low energy, contrasted by the enthusiastic crowds at Kamala Harris’s events. Yet, in the end, reality defied expectations. Were these rallies misreported, or did the media miss the sentiment driving Trump’s base?

For those disappointed by the outcome, here’s a light-hearted note: maybe it’s time to book a one-way ticket before January 20, 2025. Think Liz Cheney, Robert De Niro, Jimmy Kimmel, Hillary Clinton, and others at odds with the new direction of our country.

Hitler’s rise in 1933-34 has long fascinated historians. He exploited public discontent, channeling German frustrations into loyalty to his cause, much as Trump does today. As we brace for the next four years—or more—it’s clear that we are living in historic, if challenging, times.

National Election Forecast: Dark Clouds and Stormy

The best possible result from election day would be Kamala Harris winning the popular vote by greater than 4% and easily winning the electoral college. If that doesn’t happen, expect another 60 to 90 days of political turmoil from lawsuits, appeals, allegations of election fraud and sporadic acts of violence that will surpass the chaos of January 6, 2021.

***

I don’t need polls to tell me the definite “Losers” in this election: civility, truth, integrity, candor and self-respect.

***

This is the 18th presidential election of my lifetime. I don’t remember anything about my first two elections (Dwight Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956.) Certainly a different time regarding morals and acceptable behavior in politics in my youth. For example, I don’t think that a candidate who was found liable for sexual assault or being a convicted felon awaiting sentencing, would even get a whiff at being a candidate for national office in 1960.

***

If Kamala loses, I expect to read countless articles and criticisms on how she ran her campaign. Based on my observations, she ran a fairly positive campaign that exhibited a lot of enthusiam and energy.

***

Now we leave it up to the judgement of voters… why does this make me so apprehensive and discouraged?

Rhetorical Question??

Interesting question or admission from Fox News host Bret Baier in his “debate” with Kamala Harris yesterday…

At one point, Bret Baier asked Vice President Harris what she made of such a large number of Americans expressing support for former President Trump, while the two candidates remained largely close in polling, asking her, “Are they stupid?”

The Trump Tornado: Racing Toward the Political Maelstrom

I’m constantly amused when the media throws around the term “blockbuster” to describe some new crime, malfeasance, idiotic comment, lie, or scandal swirling around Donald Trump. At this point, can there really be anything more shocking or revolting that we haven’t already seen from him? It feels like we’ve hit the limit of outrage, and most people seem to be numb to it.

For the anti-Trump crowd, it’s clear: Trump has glided through scandal after scandal, barely touched by accountability. Nothing he does seems to stick, so what’s left to be shocked by? On the flip side, if you’re a Trump supporter, none of it matters anyway. You’ve long dismissed the onslaught of reports, evidence, and documentation. His personal behavior, crimes, and failures? They mean nothing. Trump has become untouchable in his own bubble of denial and deflection.

There’s a pervasive worry among many that if Trump returns to power, it will spell the end of democracy as we know it. But here’s the real gut-punch: if someone as blatantly unqualified as Trump can win a national election, what does that say about the judgment of the American people? And if you can’t trust the people’s judgment, how can you trust democracy itself? It’s like we’re testing the very system we claim to cherish, racing toward disaster without a second thought.

I recently came across a term that fits this moment perfectly: sanewashing. It’s the attempt to normalize abhorrent or vile behavior, especially when it’s done by politicians or the media covering for them. We’ve seen it play out endlessly, particularly with one candidate in mind. But the sad truth is, no matter how bizarre or outrageous the behavior, it often doesn’t register anymore. Why? Because we’ve allowed ourselves to grow numb to it.

It’s like those storm-chaser videos where you see a tornado bearing down, and yet there’s always some car trying to outrun it. That reckless dash parallels our current political landscape, where half the electorate seems willing to gamble on disaster. Will we outrun the storm, or will we be swallowed by it? Only time will tell, but one thing’s for sure: we’re speeding straight into the whirlwind, and it’s anyone’s guess how this ride ends.

Boom!!

One piece of offered advice in today’s heated political environment is to separate an individual’s politics from the person. You should respect them regardless of how their politics may offend or upset you. Easier said than done. If someone pulls out a match in a building with a gas leak, should I not be upset? Their reckless act endangers everyone, including me. That’s how I feel about voters choosing irresponsible candidates whose reckless behavior and proposed actions pose risks to us all.

Worthy of an SNL skit

In my 70 plus years of living and watching political debates this may have been the strangest claim by a candidate,” They’re (Haitian refugees) eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there, and this is what’s happening in our country, and it’s a shame.”

Artwork by AI; humor by MAGA

This is no longer a referendum on Donald Trump. It’s a referendum on the judgment and intelligence of the American voter.

Debate Debacle: Harris trumps Donald

Was anyone really surprised by the results of yesterday’s Presidential debate?

I did not watch the debate live. Why did anyone, particularly journalists and the press, expect anything different? There are outcries by many Republicans today that Trump was unprepared and did not have good debate management. Are you kidding?? Review any book written by a Trump administration insider and you will find that Trump does not read or prepare for anything. He “wings” it.

A word of caution to the Democrats. Hillary cleaned Trump’s clock in the 2016 debates and still lost. The MAGA mind is probably blaming ABC for their hero’s atrocious performance. It’s still not over…

2024 Election: No Choice but Kamala

I have been interested in presidential politics since I was eight years old when John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon competed against each other in 1960. If eight-year-olds could vote, I would’ve voted for John Kennedy. However, it would not have disappointed or upset me greatly if Nixon had won. I always had respect for anyone who was nominated by their Party to run for President. That respect extended until 2020. Even in 2016, I understood there was an antipathy towards Hillary Clinton. I really didn’t understand it, but I could grudgingly concede a small rationale for some people voting for Donald Trump.

I certainly don’t feel that way today. There is absolutely no argument or rationale, politically, morally, ethically. or policy wise to vote for Donald Trump and for that matter, just about anybody in the Republican party. I consider Barack Obama a great president. However, if he had lost to either John McCain or Mitt Romney, I would have been disappointed, but not devastated. Both John McCain and Mitt Romney were certainly qualified to be president.

I was not a fan of the George W. Bush/Dick Cheney administration. But I never had the fear that they would try to overthrow our democracy and turn it into a dictatorship. Nixon, as crazy as he was in the last few days of his presidency, had no intention of becoming a dictator. He had at least a modicum respect for the democratic process, our laws and the institutions of government.

I honestly cannot conceive of one rational argument for the election of Donald Trump. It’s scary that between 45 to 50% of potential voters would select him for president. Some of his supporters that I have spoken with don’t even bother trying to justify why Trump should be president. What they normally do is just attack the Democrats and come up with all types of conspiracy theories on how Trump is being persecuted.

if Joe Biden had run, I would’ve understood why some people could not have voted for him. I was also concerned about his age and cognitive abilities. However, with the nomination of Kamala Harris, there are no reasons for Democrats, Independents, and even Republicans to stay home and not vote for her. I truly hope that the positive feelings and enthusiasm for her and the Democratic ticket will last until election day and hopefully there will be a landslide that will swamp Trumpism and fascism.