Author: Eric

INTJ personality. Jack of many trades, master of some. Former banker, consultant, technical writer, marketing manager, infopreneur and communications manager, now retired. Eclectic and sometimes eccentric. Cynical and often critical.

National Election Forecast: Dark Clouds and Stormy

The best possible result from election day would be Kamala Harris winning the popular vote by greater than 4% and easily winning the electoral college. If that doesn’t happen, expect another 60 to 90 days of political turmoil from lawsuits, appeals, allegations of election fraud and sporadic acts of violence that will surpass the chaos of January 6, 2021.

***

I don’t need polls to tell me the definite “Losers” in this election: civility, truth, integrity, candor and self-respect.

***

This is the 18th presidential election of my lifetime. I don’t remember anything about my first two elections (Dwight Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956.) Certainly a different time regarding morals and acceptable behavior in politics in my youth. For example, I don’t think that a candidate who was found liable for sexual assault or being a convicted felon awaiting sentencing, would even get a whiff at being a candidate for national office in 1960.

***

If Kamala loses, I expect to read countless articles and criticisms on how she ran her campaign. Based on my observations, she ran a fairly positive campaign that exhibited a lot of enthusiam and energy.

***

Now we leave it up to the judgement of voters… why does this make me so apprehensive and discouraged?

America First: Roosevelt vs. Lindbergh in the Shadow of War by H.W. Brands (Review)


My rating: 4 of 5 stars


On September 1, 1939, fighting broke out in Europe. After the invasion of Poland by Germany, both France and England declared war against the Nazis. Many, if not most Americans, were resistant to participating in a European war. Indeed, there was resistance to even supplying military supplies and other goods to Britain while they basically fought Germany on their own. There was also significant support for the Germany and Hitler’s regime at this time.

Franklin D. Roosevelt managed a fine line. He wished to be re-elected for a third term, but he also understood that Hitler’s goals were not only the conquest of Europe, but world conquest. Charles Lindbergh was an American hero for his exploits about flying across the Atlantic on his own. He and his wife Anne endured the kidnapping and murder of his son in 1932 and this endeared him more to the American public.

Lindbergh opposed US involvement in any war overseas. Lindbergh felt that America was invincible as it was protected by oceans and not vulnerable to air attacks. Lindbergh saw no reason for America to sacrifice its sons in European wars and spoke out strongly against any intervention.

How FDR positioned the United States to prepare for World War II is an interesting story of great judgment and leadership. FDR coordinated closely with Winston Churchill to ensure that Britain had the necessary weapons and materials to survive German assaults. Roosevelt had to skillfully maneuver his aid to Churchill under the watchful eye and some time opposition of a reluctant Congress.

Charles Lindbergh was accused of being an agent and dupe of the German government. There seems to be a little evidence of that. Lindbergh firmly believed that United States could stand on its own and ably defend itself against any foreign attack or invasion. Circumstances and events proved that Lindburgh was incorrect in his analysis but he did volunteer to help the military in any capacity once United States entered the war.

Today there are isolationist policies still being supported. There are many Americans and people in Congress, who do not feel that we should be supporting Ukraine in its battle against Russia and Putin. Are they guilty of being short sighted too? There are some interesting historical similarities there.

This book was well researched and an excellent read. It quotes from Lindbergh’s diaries and provides a good measure of the man and his ambitions. I think that Lindbergh was largely circumspect and responsible in his criticism over American foreign policy. FDR happened to be right in his judgement about Hitler and America’s role in stopping tyranny.



Rhetorical Question??

Interesting question or admission from Fox News host Bret Baier in his “debate” with Kamala Harris yesterday…

At one point, Bret Baier asked Vice President Harris what she made of such a large number of Americans expressing support for former President Trump, while the two candidates remained largely close in polling, asking her, “Are they stupid?”

Pigskin Punditry

From my couch seat, I must admit that I find college football to be more entertaining and interesting than watching professional football.

***

I read and enjoyed Why We Love Football: A History in 100 Moments by Joe Posnanski. Here is my quick review of the book:

Brief capsules (1-4 pages) of 100 pro, college and high school football moments that makes the sport special. Five of the 100 moments were about the Philadelphia Eagles: 1. Chuck Bednarik’s hit on NY Giants Frank Gifford; 2. Fans throwing snowballs at Santa; 3. Miracle at the Meadowlands (Herman Edwards returning late game fumble vs Giants); 4. DeSean Jackson returning late game punt vs. Giants; and 5. Philly Special from the Super Bowl game vs. the Patriots.

There are a lot of great stories, some deserving of additional length and elaboration. For this football fan of many decades, it was a quick nostalgic trip through my memories of memorable football experiences.

I would be interested in reading his similar themed book on baseball based on how I enjoyed this work.

***

If Deshaun Watson of the Cleveland Browns tried out as QB for the University of Texas, he might make fourth string.
***

Cleveland could be a three point underdog if they played Texas.

***

Nick Sirianni has not made many friends among the local and national media or the football fans of the Philadelphia Eagles. There are calls to fire Sirianni now and not let him finish the season. But who would replace him? Is there a “coach in waiting” on the Eagles staff? Some experts are touting Bill Bellichek but I think he is an awful fit for the football culture in Philadelphia. I expect with the talent and relatively easy schedule the Eagles have, they should make the playoffs. If they don’t, then let’s revisit Siranni’s tenure in Philly.

***

I read an article by a Temple alumnus who feels that the university should terminate its college football program because of the very poor on-field results and the lack of support and attendance from students, alumni and football fans. I concur. I also think that Rutgers University football should take a step or two back. I am not at the point where they should stop playing football, but they should consider competing at a lower level. I am not sure what football conference is appropriate for the school, but the Big 10 was and still remains a gigantic leap of faith. Possibly the greatest challenge for Rutgers football is finding a quarterback that you can build an offense around. In the 30–40 years that I have been watching Rutgers football, I can only recall maybe two, maybe three quarterbacks, who were good. The rest have been largely mediocre or awful. I recall many years ago being at a high school football game where a Rutgers coach was scouting for a quarterback. I did not think that any of the quarterbacks playing on the two teams were good enough to be recruited for a major college football program and expressed that to him. I made a suggestion to the coach about another local player who did wind up playing at a Division I school at quarterback. I hope that the Rutgers scouting program has improved greatly since that time.

***



The Trump Tornado: Racing Toward the Political Maelstrom

I’m constantly amused when the media throws around the term “blockbuster” to describe some new crime, malfeasance, idiotic comment, lie, or scandal swirling around Donald Trump. At this point, can there really be anything more shocking or revolting that we haven’t already seen from him? It feels like we’ve hit the limit of outrage, and most people seem to be numb to it.

For the anti-Trump crowd, it’s clear: Trump has glided through scandal after scandal, barely touched by accountability. Nothing he does seems to stick, so what’s left to be shocked by? On the flip side, if you’re a Trump supporter, none of it matters anyway. You’ve long dismissed the onslaught of reports, evidence, and documentation. His personal behavior, crimes, and failures? They mean nothing. Trump has become untouchable in his own bubble of denial and deflection.

There’s a pervasive worry among many that if Trump returns to power, it will spell the end of democracy as we know it. But here’s the real gut-punch: if someone as blatantly unqualified as Trump can win a national election, what does that say about the judgment of the American people? And if you can’t trust the people’s judgment, how can you trust democracy itself? It’s like we’re testing the very system we claim to cherish, racing toward disaster without a second thought.

I recently came across a term that fits this moment perfectly: sanewashing. It’s the attempt to normalize abhorrent or vile behavior, especially when it’s done by politicians or the media covering for them. We’ve seen it play out endlessly, particularly with one candidate in mind. But the sad truth is, no matter how bizarre or outrageous the behavior, it often doesn’t register anymore. Why? Because we’ve allowed ourselves to grow numb to it.

It’s like those storm-chaser videos where you see a tornado bearing down, and yet there’s always some car trying to outrun it. That reckless dash parallels our current political landscape, where half the electorate seems willing to gamble on disaster. Will we outrun the storm, or will we be swallowed by it? Only time will tell, but one thing’s for sure: we’re speeding straight into the whirlwind, and it’s anyone’s guess how this ride ends.

Boom!!

One piece of offered advice in today’s heated political environment is to separate an individual’s politics from the person. You should respect them regardless of how their politics may offend or upset you. Easier said than done. If someone pulls out a match in a building with a gas leak, should I not be upset? Their reckless act endangers everyone, including me. That’s how I feel about voters choosing irresponsible candidates whose reckless behavior and proposed actions pose risks to us all.

Asheville NC

Quiet, scenic, green, serene, an oasis of rustic culture, good food, crafts, antiques and a subdued lifestyle. One day, paradise; next day, hell. Roads flooded. Homes and businesses destroyed by wind, floodwaters and mud. And within this maelstrom, eerily silence. No contact with the outside world. No help to rescue trapped, injured and dying citizens. No way to escape. It felt like the end of the world…

Asheville Trip May 2016 Eric Burleigh

Nature’s fury cannot be controlled, and one cannot reason with it. It is indiscriminate in its horror and its victims. Nature’s fury does not respect age, whether a person has led a good and moral life and what its affected targets are. Nature’s fury does not respect beauty and tranquility. It rampages blindly, horrifically and without pity.

I hope that the residents of Asheville NC and the surrounding communities are able to recover from this devastation as soon as possible. However I’m sure the scars and memories of Helene will last a long time. It’s a lesson for all of us, one day, blue skies; the next day, death and destruction.

Mr. McMahon Netflix Documentary (Review)

Disclosure: Not something that I readily admit to, but I have been a follower of professional wrestling for over 60 years. I grew up watching Bruno Sammartino, Bobo Brazil, The Kangaroos, Buddy Rogers, and many other wrestlers. Even at an early age, I never fell into the trap that what I was watching was totally real. I admired the athleticism and strength of the wrestlers, but I knew that the results were predetermined. I was always interested in how matches and wrestlers were booked. I had a sense of what the business was all about.

I don’t think there is anyone who has had a bigger influence on the pro wrestling entertainment business than Vince McMahon. He certainly is a very controversial figure. So I was very curious to view the documentary about him, especially given the recent allegations of sexual abuse and deviant behavior against him.

Here are my observations and quick review about the documentary…

  • There were no major blockbusters or surprises for this viewer. Bill Simmons, who produced the documentary, acknowledged that for the regular wrestling fan, that they may not find anything new in terms of information or disclosure. I was a little surprised at how the decision to have the Undertaker beaten by Brock Lesnar at Wrestlemania was basically communicated at the last moment.
  • I would not have wanted to be Shane or Stephanie McMahon. I certainly was not impressed to hear things about Vince as a father. The recent allegations against Vince may or may not be charges that are a surprise to them. I found it very creepy that Vince proposed an angle where Stephanie was pregnant and he was the one responsible.
  • I’m not sure why Linda McMahon is still married to him. My guess is that she knew the type of man he was and realized that he was not going to change. Vince has alluded that he has a huge sexual appetite and this has lead to speculation and rumors of his infidelity.
  • Vince was obviously an excellent businessman and a ruthless one at that. He was able to take a wrestling organization that was based in the northeast U.S. and make it a global organization. He was largely able to accomplish this by being a bully. He bullied his wrestlers, other wrestling promoters, the press and his employees.
  • Donald Trump and Vince McMahon share many traits. Both are thin skinned to criticism, unabashed skirt chasers and know how to appeal and motivate the baser instincts and prejudices of their audience and followers. It certainly understandable why Trump and McMahon were natural business partners in various wrestling promotions.
  • What one learns and watching the documentary is how McMahon manipulates his wrestlers and employees. Even those who he has treated very poorly have often commented on how they have a grudging respect for him. McMahon was always about “doing what was right for business” and if people were uncomfortable in doing what he demanded, he got rid of them. Wendy Richter and Bret Hart’s stories are instructive of this attitude.
  • The non-wrestling fan may enjoy this documentary. McMahon is a fascinating character both on the mat and off it. He is a very successful entrepreneur. As a human being, he has his flaws and this documentary details many of them.
  • The documentary did not go into any significant detail into the allegations against McMahon by a former female employee, who felt that she was his slave and asked to perform various deviant sexual act with McMahon and others. Maybe that will be examined in a part two of the McMahon documentary.